Her performance reviews for the last year had been glowing, so the letter made no sense. “It’s not a real explanation,” she said.
The USFWS layoffs will not affect the sea lamprey control program in Canada, McClinchey said. “The Canadian government has assured us that the money from Canada will continue to be there and we’re on track to deliver a full program in Canadian waters,” he said. “That’s great, but this program works because it’s border blind.”
In other words: Cuts to lamprey control in US waters are a threat to fish and fishermen everywhere on the Great Lakes.
Just a week ago, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission faced a more dire staffing situation, as the USFWS informed directors they’d also be unable to hire seasonal workers to spread lampricide come April. Within a few days, that hiring freeze was reversed, said McClinchey.
This reversal gives him a bit of hope. “That at least tells us no one is rooting for the lamprey,” he said.
McClinchey is currently in DC for appropriation season, presenting the commission’s work to members of Congress and defending the agency’s budget. It’s an annual trip, but this year he’s also advocating for the reinstatement of laid-off lamprey control employees.
He is optimistic. “It seems clear to me that it’s important we preserve this program, and so far everyone we’ve encountered thinks that way and are working to that end,” he said.
Cutting back the program isn’t really on the table for the commission. Even minor cuts to scope would be devastating for the fishery, he said.
Even the former USFWS employee from Marquette is remaining hopeful. “I still think that they’re going to scramble to make it happen,” she said. “Because it’s not really an option to just stop treating for a whole season.”
This story originally appeared on Inside Climate News.
